Intelligence as shown by LLMs is interesting. Here by memory I mean “context window size” though they are not equivalent. And by “Intelligence” I don’t mean human intelligence which jumps into metaphysical debates. Perhaps “cognitive ability” to solve a task at hand is reasonable narrow definition. At the advent of LLMs the available “context window”for an LLM was limited and took the longest to scale. This led to real funny problems when LLMs were tasked with long running conversations or fed documents that ate up their context window.

Agentic coding is a phenomenal experience. I’ve been working with AI coding agents for a year now, primarily using Claude Code after trying a variety of models. But there’s one well-known problem — they have a ‘context window’ - a limited memory area for what they’re holding in their ‘agentic minds’. Context is nearly everything because it guides them to approach the task from the proper perspective and captures the small details that wire projects together, keeping the process focused and relevant.

This post evaluates HTMX, a simple framework that uses attributes to enhance HTML with SPA behaviours. Instead of a full-blown javascript framework, it progressively enhances plain HTML to build capabilities. Better articles have been written on why.

We will focus on IF it helps bring SPA-like behaviour intuitively without JavaScript fatigue.

What is the yield you can expect in your Bitcoin investment? Is there a consistent rate of return? Will it outperform other markets? Better than stock market returns? Gold? Will it beat inflation?

All these questions arise from the traditional mindset trained to evaluate everything as financial returns vis-a-vis dollars or whatever fiat currency the prospective investor holds.

But Bitcoin, by its very nature, cannot promise any of these things. Those who say otherwise are wrong. What are we investing in if it is not any of the above?